3rd district refuses to lock up an individual who violates trespass order

 It has come to our attention that the Chicago Police Department District 3 is not upholding the law. Under(720 ILCS 5/21-3) (from Ch. 38, par. 21-3) Is for real property such as apartment buildings and residential property. The Officer's state that a landlord can not prohibit someone from visiting a relative or friend but CHA Security and Police did this all day long was lock people up for trespassing on State Supported land including a few of Chicago's finest were arrested because they were not supposed to be on the land. However the 3rd district compares this Orange to the bag of Apples.Under (720 ILCS 5/21-5) (from Ch. 38, par. 21-5)is were CHA security and police made arrests. Under 720 ILCS 5/21-3 clearly states 

(a) A person commits criminal trespass to real property when he or she:          (1) knowingly and without lawful authority enters or

remains within or on a building;

(2) enters upon the land of another, after receiving,

prior to the entry, notice from the owner or occupant that the entry is forbidden;

(3) remains upon the land of another, after receiving

notice from the owner or occupant to depart;

(3.5) presents false documents or falsely represents

his or her identity orally to the owner or occupant of a building or land in order to obtain permission from the owner or occupant to enter or remain in the building or on the land;

(3.7) intentionally removes a notice posted on

residential real estate as required by subsection (l) of Section 15-1505.8 of Article XV of the Code of Civil Procedure before the date and time set forth in the notice; or

(4) enters a field used or capable of being used for

growing crops, an enclosed area containing livestock, an agricultural building containing livestock, or an orchard in or on a motor vehicle (including an off-road vehicle, motorcycle, moped, or any other powered two-wheel vehicle) after receiving, prior to the entry, notice from the owner or occupant that the entry is forbidden or remains upon or in the area after receiving notice from the owner or occupant to depart.

There for under the law a person(s) is subject to arrest without warrant and under section for trespassing on residential or commercial. So I don't know where the officer's get off saying they will not lock up anyone. We can only imagine that these cops wont do their job is because they are either A) getting a kick back from this guy or B) feel that their job is in jeopardy because the man's uncle has some type of power over the 3rd District. I suggest the 3rd District start doing their job or they can find them selves on the unemployment line as this site will be following this and communicating the problems with 35th Street and the elected officials until the officer's are stripped of their police power's.