ON JANUARY 1, 2013, THE US GOVERNMENT WILL BE REQUIRING EVERYONE TO
HAVE DIRECT DEPOSIT FOR SS CHECKS.
WONDER WHY?
Subject: HR 4646
Be sure to read entire explanation
Watch for this AFTER November elections; remember this BEFORE you
VOTE, in case you think Obama is looking out for your best interest.
A 1% tax on all bank transactions is what
HR 4646 calls for.
Do you receive a paycheck, or a retirement check from Social
Security or a pension fund and have
it direct deposit??
Well guess what … It looks as if Obama wants
to tax it 1% !!!
This bill was put forth by Rep. Chaka Fattah
(D-PA).
YES, that is 1% tax on all bank transactions -
HR 4646, every time it goes in and every time money goes out.
Ask your congressperson to vote NO.
FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!
1% tax on all bank transactions ~ HR 4646 -
ANOTHER NEW OBAMA TAX SLIPPED IN WHILE WE WERE ASLEEP.
Checked this on snopes, it’s true!
Check it out yourself ~ HR 4646.
President Obama’s finance team is recommending a one percent (1%)
transaction fee (TAX). Obama’s plan is to sneak it in after the November
elections to keep it under the radar.
This is a 1% tax on all transactions at any financial institution -
banks, credit unions, savings and loans, etc. Any deposit you make, or even a
transfer within your own bank from one account to another, will have a 1% tax
charged.
If your paycheck or your Social Security or whatever is direct
deposit, it will get a 1% tax charged for the transaction.
If your paycheck is $1000, then you will pay Obama $10 just for the
privilege of depositing your paycheck in your bank. Even if you hand carry your
paycheck or any check in to your
bank for a deposit, 1% tax will be charged.
You receive a $5,000 stock dividend from your broker, Obama takes
$50 just to allow you to deposit that check in the bank.
If you take $1,000 cash to deposit at your bank, 1% tax will be
charged.
Mind you, this is from the man who promised
that, if you make under $250,000 per year,
you will not see one penny of new tax.
Keep your eyes and ears open, you will be amazed at what you learn
about this guy’s
under-the-table moves to increase the number
of ways you are taxed.
Oh, and by the way, if you receive a refund from the IRS next year
and you have it direct deposited or you walk in to deposit that check, you
guessed it. You will pay a 1% charge of that money just
for putting it in your bank.
Remember, any money, cash, check or whatever, no matter where it
came from, you will pay a 1% fee if you put it in the bank.
Some will say, oh well, it’s just 1%. Are you kidding me?
It’s a 1% tax increase across the board. Remember, once the tax is
there, they can also raise it at will. And if anyone protests, they will
just say, “Oh, that’s not really a tax, it’s a user fee”!
Think this is no big deal? Go back and look at
the transactions you made from last year’s banking statements. Then
add the total of all those transactions and deduct 1%.
Still think it’s no big deal?
The following is copied from Snopes:
1. snopes.com: Debt Free America Act
Is the U.S. government proposing a 1% tax on debit card usage and/or
banking transactions?
…It is true. The bill is HR – 4646 introduced by US Rep Peter
deFazio D-Oregon and US Senator Tom Harkin D-Iowa. Their plan is to sneak it in
after the…
…moved beyond proposing studies and submitted the Debt Free
America Act (H.R. 4646 ), a bill calling for the implementation of
a scheme to pay down the…
…[2010] by Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-Pa.). His “Debt Free America Act”
(H.R. 4646 ) would impose a 1 percent “transaction tax” on every financial
transaction…
————————————–
Don’t wait for Social Security check in the mail – Mail drop: Social Security payments, other federal benefits, switching soon to direct deposit
WASHINGTON – Starting next year, the check will no longer be in the mail for millions of people who receive Social Security and other government benefits.
The federal government, which issues 73 million payments a month, is phasing out paper checks for all benefit programs, requiring people to get payments electronically, either through direct deposit or a debit card for those without a bank account.
The changes will affect people who get Social Security, veterans’ benefits, railroad pensions and federal disability payments. Tax refunds are exempt, but the Internal Revenue Service encourages taxpayers to get refunds electronically by processing those refunds faster than paper checks.
About 90 percent of people who receive federal benefits already get their payments electronically, the Treasury Department says. New beneficiaries were required to get payments electronically starting last year, and with a few exceptions, the rest will have to make the switch by March 2013.
“It’s just that natural progression of moving to how people are used to receiving their funds,” said Walt Henderson, director of the Treasury Department’s electronic funds transfer division.
Henderson said electronic payments are safer and more efficient than paper checks; in 2010, more than 540,000 federal benefit checks were reported lost or stolen. The switch will save the government about $120 million a year. Social Security will save $1 billion over the next decade, according to the Treasury Department.
“You think of that paper check floating out there in the delivery system, with personal information on it, it’s much more susceptible to fraud versus an electronic payment,” Henderson said.
Advocates for seniors say they understand the government’s desire to cut costs and take advantage of technologies that most workers already use. The food stamp program switched from paper coupons to debit cards in 2004.
But they have raised concerns about requiring the switch for older retirees who may not be used to electronic payments.
“This will affect some very frail elderly people who are living by themselves, many of them, and doing well, but usually within the context of that old paper check that they deposit in the bank,” said Web Phillips, a senior policy advisor for the National Committee to Protect Social Security and Medicare.
“The change has to be handled carefully and with a lot of sensitivity so that there aren’t people who lose track of a payment or don’t understand that they have a card that came in the mail that’s the source of their payment,” Phillips said. “That’s our concern.”
The switch is mandated by a Treasury rule issued in December 2010. Since then, the department has worked to educate the public. The government has created a website, www.GoDirect.org and a toll-free phone number, 1-800-333-1795, people can call for assistance.
“Treasury acknowledges they have a lot of education to do for people about how these things work,” said David Certner, legislative policy director for AARP. “We’re a bit concerned about how easy it’s going to be to provide education, particularly for some in this older population who are not familiar with debit cards and don’t have bank accounts.”
Certner said AARP wants the government to make it easier to get an exemption. Under the Treasury rule, current beneficiaries who are 90 and older won’t be required to make the switch. People can get a waiver if using a debit card would impose a hardship, but the Treasury Department says those would be “extreme, rare circumstances.”
These waivers are not well publicized on the government’s website.
“There are several million people who receive paper checks today,” Certner said. “Some of them do it because they have worked out arrangements for them that work.”
AARP also has concerns about fees associated with the debit cards. The Direct Express cards are issued by Comerica Bank, Treasury’s financial agent. Each month, benefit payments are added to the cards, which can be used to make purchases or withdraw cash from ATMs.
There are no fees for using the debit card to make purchases. They can be used at any retailer that accepts MasterCard debit cards. If a card is lost or stolen, the beneficiary is protected from unauthorized use as long as the missing card is reported promptly.
Cardholders can make one free ATM withdrawal each time a payment is registered in the card. Subsequent withdrawals will cost 90 cents each, and all withdrawals may be subject to fees by the owner of the ATM.
The government’s switch to electronic payments also comes with a side effect: less business for the U.S. Postal Service, an agency that is already facing big budget problems with the rise of email and electronic bill paying.
The private sector has been migrating to electronic payments for years, costing the Postal Service millions of customers, said Alan Robinson, editor of the Postal Journal, a trade publication.
“Normally, these things happen one customer at a time,” Robinson said. “In terms of payments, this is probably one of the largest.”