Duffy recently introduced Senate Bill 26, a bill which would prohibit camera enforcement of right turn on red violations.
“The U.S. Department of Transportation said you can drive from here to Jupiter and back and never been in an incident turning right on red,” says Duffy. “It (right turn on red camera enforcement) has nothing to do with safety. It’s all about revenue and not about safety.”
Duffy contends that 90% of red light camera revenue comes from drivers rolling through a right turn on red (where it’s legally permitted) at just one or two miles per hour instead of coming to a complete stop.
“From the info I have over 90% of the income comes from right turn on red,” says Duffy. “They (RLC companies) will not provide a breakdown of where the revenue comes from. If these figures are wrong, prove me wrong.”
Although Duffy contends by adding this restriction to Illinois law municipalities currently using camera enforcement for right on red violations would see a dramatic drop in revenue, none of the towns we spoke to seemed bothered by SB26.
Sunday, October 14, 2012
CBS news on Melrose Park red Light


MELROSE PARK, Ill. (CBS) — You know the feeling. You’re driving through an intersection when suddenly, you see the red-light camera flash.
The fear of that flash has drivers in one suburb stuck in traffic -– by choice. They’re sitting at red lights, sometimes tying up traffic because they’re so afraid of getting a $100 ticket, CBS 2’s Pamela Jones reports.
Some say it’s a flashing frenzy at North and First avenues in Melrose Park — red-light cameras sometimes going off several times a minute.
But it turns out not everyone getting snapped is breaking the law. And that has drivers scared to move.
“I did that once at this very same traffic light. I stopped. I waited, and yet I was still ticketed,” one motorist said.
Some say it’s a flashing frenzy at North and First avenues in Melrose Park — red-light cameras sometimes going off several times a minute.
But it turns out not everyone getting snapped is breaking the law. And that has drivers scared to move.
CBS 2 observed drivers sitting at the corner, refusing to turn right on red, even though posted signs say that is permitted as long as you make a complete stop.
CBS 2 tested the system, stopping at the corner for more than five second. The camera went off.
Drivers say they’re tired of that sinking feeling when they think they’re obeying the rules of the road, but then look up in their rear-view mirror and see the flashing lights, anyway.
Melrose Park police say drivers who stop completely before turning won’t get tickets. A police officer reviews all the images from the cameras and decides who should get ticketed.
Melrose Park scams motorist


Whats on the sarges mind has started an investigation in to redlight ticket scams by the village below you will find evidence of our findings.
From Topix "My wife got a hundred dollar ticket from the Melrose Park Red Light Vigilante. She stopped for one second before turning right on red. This was on North Avenue, early in the morning and no other cars were in sight. Our appeal was denied.
If this is how Melrose Park wants to raise revenue, then you don't need our money being spent in your stores and other local businesses. The business community should tell the Melrose Village Government they are driving business away with their gestapo red light tactics.
Best wishes to you! We love your businesses, but we hate your greedy government" Scammed Motorist 1
If this is how Melrose Park wants to raise revenue, then you don't need our money being spent in your stores and other local businesses. The business community should tell the Melrose Village Government they are driving business away with their gestapo red light tactics.
Best wishes to you! We love your businesses, but we hate your greedy government" Scammed Motorist 1
I am sorry but after reviewing the law under 625 ILCS 5 Melrose Park is in violation of entrapment.
Whats On The Sarge's Mind has forward our findings to WGN, CBS, WFLD, and ABC for further investigation hopeing that more people will come forward about how there is no signs posted explaining that motorist can not turn right on red. We will be posting our video from our infraction below the Police Departments Web Site. If you folks never read one of our entire blogs this is the one to read all the way through there is information on what intersections have no signs that you will get a 100 dollar ticket for and until Melrose Park fixes the issue we will keep going out there and photographing and blogging about it
here are the intersections to stay away from.
| Illinois | Melrose Park | 1st Ave and North Ave. | $100 | Right Turn Camera | video - took video from rear - ticket taking right turn on red - ordinance violation | Map |
| Illinois | Melrose Park | 5th and North Ave | $100 | Right Turn Camera | No Right Turn Red Light | Map |
| Illinois | Melrose park | 5th and North Ave | $100 | Both Red Light and Right Turn Cameras | E/B, W/B Right Turns, Captures over white lines | Map |
| Illinois | melrose park | north Ave and 25th Ave | 100 | Both Red Light and Right Turn Cameras |
This all Melrose Park will tell you is to go here
1 N. Broadway Melrose Park, IL. 60160
ph: (708) 344-8409, fax: (708) 344-9065
Study: Red-light cameras save lives
Red-light cameras are helping drivers remember that red means stop and are saving lives, according to a new study by the Insurance Institute for Highway SafetyThe study concludes that the cameras have reduced the rate of fatal crashes involving motorists who run red lights by 24 percent in 14 large cities with red-light cameras. more info
Red Light Camera
Village of Melrose Park - Red Light Camera Locations 1st Ave & North Ave. (East) 5th Ave & North Ave. ( East, West) 9th Ave & North Ave. ( East) 25th & North Ave. (East, West & South) Mannheim & Lake Street (East, North)
| ||||||
RED LIGHT CAMERA LOCATIONS
1st Ave & North Ave. (East)
5th Ave & North Ave. ( East, West)
9th Ave & North Ave. ( East)
25th & North Ave. (East, West & South)
Mannheim & Lake Street (East, North)
To pay Red Light Tickets online
click here
For Red Light Tickets on 25th & North Ave.
click here
1st Ave & North Ave. (East)
5th Ave & North Ave. ( East, West)
9th Ave & North Ave. ( East)
25th & North Ave. (East, West & South)
Mannheim & Lake Street (East, North)
To pay Red Light Tickets online
click here
For Red Light Tickets on 25th & North Ave.
click here
Village of Melrose Park
Melrose Park Fire Department Melrose Park Police Department, 1 N. Broadway Melrose Park, IL. | ph: (708) 344-8409 | Records Department Hours: Mon - Fri: 7:30am - 5pm
Designed & Developed by: La Spisa Studios
Melrose Park Fire Department Melrose Park Police Department, 1 N. Broadway Melrose Park, IL. | ph: (708) 344-8409 | Records Department Hours: Mon - Fri: 7:30am - 5pm
Designed & Developed by: La Spisa Studios
Saturday, October 13, 2012
Melrose Park scams people with camera tickets stay away
Me and a buddy of mine where heading West on North Ave and made a right hand turn on to North Bound 25th Ave. months later the City of Melrose Park send my buddy a red light traffic notice. Here is the fucked up thing of this ticket if you look at the photographs below there is no sign telling you that a right on red is not allowed. Under 625 ILCS 5 Ch 95 1/2 par 11-306 clearly states a sign must be posted. If you click on this link video of entrapment you will see Melrose Park has no signs anywhere in there village stating you can not turn right on red. Melrose Park will say your still guilty and you need to pay it then you have to file a court hearing before a judge and jury and spend all this money to fight a ticket and then you can not get refunded for the court cost. Melrose Park this is entrapment and a revenue skeem. De Luca Vs. the City of Blue Island Illinois a Blue Island Police Officer pulled De Luca over and wrote him a traffic tiket for going down a one way the wrong way. A judge declaired that Blue Island was negligent in making sure signs can be seen by motorist and fined the village the 75.00 for entrapment and for violating the Illinois vehicle code.
I advise Melrose Park to dismiss all cases that are right turn on red tickets.

Thursday, October 11, 2012
America needs to wake up
President Obama passed H.R. 1540: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2012
signed off on this making it law well here is the sections giving military the right to violate your constitutional rights,
(b) COVERED PERSONS.—A covered person under this section is any person as follows:
(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored those responsible for those attacks.
(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.
(c) DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR.—The disposition of a person under the law of war as described in subsection (a) may include the following:
(1) Detention under the law of war without trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force.
(2) Trial under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code (as amended by the Military Commissions Act of 2009 (title XVIII of Public Law 111–84)).
(3) Transfer for trial by an alternative court or competent tribunal having lawful jurisdiction.
(4) Transfer to the custody or control of the person’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity.
(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force.
(e) AUTHORITIES.— In this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.
(f) REQUIREMENT FOR BRIEFINGS OF CONGRESS.—
The Secretary of Defense shall regularly brief Congress regarding the application of the authority described in this section, including the organizations, entities, and individuals considered to be ‘‘covered persons’’ for purposes of subsection (b)(2).
signed off on this making it law well here is the sections giving military the right to violate your constitutional rights,
Sec. 1021. Affirmation of authority of the Armed Forces of the United States to detain
covered persons pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force.
a) IN GENERAL.—Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all
necessary and appropriate force
pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law
107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note) includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the
United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending
disposition under the law of war.
(b) COVERED PERSONS.—A covered person under this section is any person as follows:
(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored those responsible for those attacks.
(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners, including any person who has committed a belligerent act or has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy forces.
(c) DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR.—The disposition of a person under the law of war as described in subsection (a) may include the following:
(1) Detention under the law of war without trial until the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for Use of Military Force.
(2) Trial under chapter 47A of title 10, United States Code (as amended by the Military Commissions Act of 2009 (title XVIII of Public Law 111–84)).
(3) Transfer for trial by an alternative court or competent tribunal having lawful jurisdiction.
(4) Transfer to the custody or control of the person’s country of origin, any other foreign country, or any other foreign entity.
(d) CONSTRUCTION.—Nothing in this section is intended to limit or expand the authority of the President or the scope of the Authorization for Use of Military Force.
(e) AUTHORITIES.— In this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.
(f) REQUIREMENT FOR BRIEFINGS OF CONGRESS.—
The Secretary of Defense shall regularly brief Congress regarding the application of the authority described in this section, including the organizations, entities, and individuals considered to be ‘‘covered persons’’ for purposes of subsection (b)(2).
Monday, September 24, 2012
Chicago Mounted Police District are asking for help
$5,000 Reward
for the capture of
the offender's who
assaulted two police
Officer's while in their stable at 71st and Yates
The Chicago police have offered a reward for any information leading to the arrest, & conviction of the offender's who assaulted two police officer's. Look fuck the reward who ever assaulted these Horses should come forward. Your charges are animal curilty, battery to the police, breaking and entering, criminal damage to municiple property, criminal damage to city property, aggrivated battery to the police and trespassing at the very least. You animal's that did this need to turn your self in cause if the communtiy gets you what evers left will be sent in a box to your mother. So the sarge is asking his readers to please ask if anyone has herd anything about who did this. If you find out anything please let the mounted officer's or Chicago Police District know as this pretains to their 4 legged partner's. This saddens me very much as I am an animal lover
Friday, September 21, 2012
greety DCFS case workers care more about money than Kids
Let me give you some faces DCFS Neglected to care for while these children where on their watch.
![]() |
| A personal touch from the victim I know |
![]() |
| Mom threw boiling water on him while a DCFS agent was present |
“Who protects the children?” the demonstrators chanted. “We do! Save jobs! Save the kids!”
The rally at the Thompson Center was held less than two weeks before 375 positions at the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services are due to be eliminated.
A nearly $90 million cut in the agency’s budget this fiscal year has forced the layoffs.
DCFS Director Richard Calica said he has no choice but to cut caseworkers in the voluntary intact family services program, credited with helping to reduce foster care rolls through linking struggling parents with needed services.
Members of the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees said that without the program the alternative is to remove those at-risk kids from their homes at greater expense to the state.
![]() |
| Was taken away from parents who abused drugs now she is dead |
Quinn signed the state budget in July but proposed shifting about $57 million to DCFS in savings that he said could come from his plan to close some state prisons and juvenile facilities.
His recommendation, though, needs legislative approval. Lawmakers, some opposed to closing facilities in their districts, won’t return to Springfield until after the layoffs in late November.
“I think children are far more important than keeping half-empty facilities open,” Quinn told reporters Wednesday. “I think it’s much better to help people than keep facilities open that aren’t needed.”
The demonstrators were joined by some Chicago Teachers Union organizers, who spoke of strength in solidarity.
Tammy Harvey, a longtime DCFS employee, clutched a doll that workers use when interviewing children as a tool to demonstrate abuse. She said her job is on the chopping block.
“I always say this job is like a calling,” she said through tears. “You really have to care about people and want to help them to make the change that will keep their family together.”
Last year, 4,600 families with more than 14,000 children received intact family services. DCFS workers handled 80 percent of the cases while the remaining 20 percent were referred to private agencies.
The Tribune reported earlier this month DCFS plans to lay off all state intact family workers and direct private agencies to handle all future cases.
At least 1,500 fewer families will receive the voluntary services as a result, the newspaper found, a 33 percent reduction. Calica agreed more kids will be removed from their homes as an alternative.
“Without us, vulnerable and needy families will be left without what is sometimes the only support they have,” said Sharon Moriarty-Cordin, who said this is the fourth time she has faced a layoff in her 12 years at DCFS.
DCFS administrators estimate 285 workers will lose their jobs along with another nearly 100 unfilled positions. There’s a chance administrators could delays
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










